Projects
Vibe Coding Review
Portfolio project record for phase-aware review gates used to keep AI-assisted coding work inside approved scope.
Summary
- Maintains explicit phase boundaries, non-goals, and verification gates.
- Represented in the Skill catalog as an owned workflow reference.
Problem
- AI-assisted implementation can drift into unapproved scope unless phase gates, evidence, and review rules are explicit.
- The workflow has catalog evidence, but future proof should still distinguish process records from product claims.
Approach
- Capture phase boundaries, non-goals, validation commands, and review criteria as an owned workflow record.
- Link only to verified internal SkillDex routes or release records rather than inventing external proof.
Evidence artifacts
The owned workflow is represented as a SkillDex record.
Phase 16B deploy verificationworkflow
The prior Phase 16B record verified the production static app; Phase 17 does not create a new deployment.
No verified URL attached
Proof boundary
Missing public proof stays visible here as TBD, pending, planned, prototype, research, or note-style evidence. SkillDex does not turn unverified artifacts into proof links.
Related skills
Related skills are navigation and workflow-capability links. They do not replace evidence artifacts and should not be read as proof that a project is shipped.
- activeProject ManagementMy skillVibe Coding Review
A personal project-governance Skill for keeping AI-assisted coding work aligned with project briefs, active phases, review gates, and explicit non-goals.
- activeProject ManagementOther skillGH Address Comments
A Codex Skill for collecting GitHub PR review or issue comments and helping address selected threads with gh CLI context.
- activeDevOps / DeploymentOther skillGH Fix CI
A Codex Skill for investigating failing GitHub Actions checks, reading logs with gh, and preparing a bounded fix plan.
- activeProject ManagementOther skillSkill Creator
A Claude Skill for creating, improving, and evaluating Skills with explicit trigger descriptions and test prompts.
Next steps
- Add a public case study only after a complete review cycle can be shown without exposing private project data.
- Keep release records and validation commands attached to future workflow examples.